Michael Polanyi and Lucian Blaga as Philosophers of Knowledge :: Philosophy Philosophical Essays

Michael Polanyi and Lucian Blaga as Philosophers of KnowledgeABSTRACT Polanyi and Blaga are two centennial philosophers who could be compared. They both are philosophers who urinate abandoned the attempt to dismantle intuition as the form of culture capable of complete objectivity and the language only if in terms of its referential force, to make representational association electroneutral and to split f behave from value. 1. Polanyis epistemologyPolanyi and Blaga are two centennial philosophers who could be put into comparison. twain are philosophers who have abandoned the attempt to analyze acquirement as the form of culture capable of complete objectivity, to analyze language solely in terms of its referential force, and to make representational knowledge impersonal and to split fact from value.Michael Polanyi affirms the irreducible involvement of personal commitment in the perception and fellow feeling of transpersonal reality. He is against the representational expres sivist theory of language. According to his theory any assertion of fact expresses beliefs, and are essentially accompanied by feelings of satisfaction or of desire. The act of knowing includes an appraisal, a personal coefficient that shapes all factual knowledge. Polanyi emphasizes the constituent of the activity of the knower in the formation of knowledge and also is aware of their variability date insisting that we aim at truth with universal intent although we faeces never quite get there. His book Personal Knowledge should help to restore science to its rightful place in an integrated culture as part of the whole persons continuing endeavor to make sense of the totality of his experience. True means something several(predicate) in different societies.The critical period of Western philosophy, open up by Descartes and brought to its coming to an end, and the post-critical era is emerging. Michael Polanyi, it appears to me, is the most important philosophical figure openin g up this new direction and delineating its basic elements. Regarding the critical pretensions to have imbed a way, either through philosophical keen-sightedity or by means of scientific method, to a universal perspective, Polanyi points out that thinkers of the critical period have pursued a mistaken ideal of objectivity.Thus, when we claim greater objectivity for Copernican theory, we do affect that its excellence is, not a matter of personal essay on our part, but an inherent quality deserving universal acceptance by rational creatures. We abandon the cruder anthropocentrism of our senses, but only favor of a more ambitious anthropocentrism of our reason (PK p.Michael Polanyi and Lucian Blaga as Philosophers of Knowledge Philosophy Philosophical EssaysMichael Polanyi and Lucian Blaga as Philosophers of KnowledgeABSTRACT Polanyi and Blaga are two centennial philosophers who could be compared. They both are philosophers who have abandoned the attempt to analyze science as th e form of culture capable of complete objectivity and the language solely in terms of its referential force, to make representational knowledge impersonal and to split fact from value. 1. Polanyis epistemologyPolanyi and Blaga are two centennial philosophers who could be put into comparison. Both are philosophers who have abandoned the attempt to analyze science as the form of culture capable of complete objectivity, to analyze language solely in terms of its referential force, and to make representational knowledge impersonal and to split fact from value.Michael Polanyi affirms the irreducible involvement of personal commitment in the perception and understanding of transpersonal reality. He is against the representational expressivist theory of language. According to his theory all assertion of fact expresses beliefs, and are essentially accompanied by feelings of satisfaction or of desire. The act of knowing includes an appraisal, a personal coefficient that shapes all factual kn owledge. Polanyi emphasizes the role of the activity of the knower in the formation of knowledge and also is aware of their variability while insisting that we aim at truth with universal intent although we can never quite get there. His book Personal Knowledge should help to restore science to its rightful place in an integrated culture as part of the whole persons continuing endeavor to make sense of the totality of his experience. True means something different in different societies.The critical period of Western philosophy, opened by Descartes and brought to its coming to an end, and the post-critical era is emerging. Michael Polanyi, it appears to me, is the most important philosophical figure opening up this new direction and delineating its basic elements. Regarding the critical pretensions to have found a way, either through philosophical rationality or by means of scientific method, to a universal perspective, Polanyi points out that thinkers of the critical period have pu rsued a mistaken ideal of objectivity.Thus, when we claim greater objectivity for Copernican theory, we do imply that its excellence is, not a matter of personal taste on our part, but an inherent quality deserving universal acceptance by rational creatures. We abandon the cruder anthropocentrism of our senses, but only favor of a more ambitious anthropocentrism of our reason (PK p.